myOneFlow

Unlocking User Autonomy in the Jobs Module

Unlocking User Autonomy in the Jobs Module

Unlocking User Autonomy in the Jobs Module

myOneFlow is a workforce management platform designed to support both job seekers and the agencies that guide them.
When I joined the project, the challenge was to reimagine how its Jobs module could truly empower users — by reducing dependency, streamlining workflows, and building trust across three very different groups: job seekers, case managers, and employers.

Industry

Workforce Management

Workforce Management

Workforce Management

Role

UX Research, UX and UI Design

UX Research, UX and UI Design

UX Research, UX and UI Design

Duration

12 weeks

12 weeks

12 weeks

Team

Sanika, Vikas, Sneha

Sanika, Vikas, Sneha

Sanika, Vikas, Sneha

In a hurry?

Feel free to skip ahead—though you might miss a great story! Hope you find what you need!

THE BIG PICTURE

At its core, the Jobs Module was meant to connect job seekers, case managers, and employers into one seamless ecosystem


But in reality, it was broken:

  • Job seekers couldn’t explore independently.

  • Employers struggled to find candidates.

  • Case managers became bottlenecks, forced to mediate every interaction.


The result? A platform that slowed down the very process it was designed to accelerate. For the workforce organization, this inefficiency meant higher staffing costs, delayed outcomes, and missed opportunities to showcase value.

CHALLENGES

Three tensions shaped this problem space:

Disconnected Workflows Across Portals

The path from posting to application felt fragmented, not continuous.

High Dependency on Case Managers

Every interaction flowed through case managers, adding overhead.

Lack of Trust and Clarity for Job Seekers

Clients were unsure which jobs were most relevant or reliable, leading to low engagement.

The Real Design Tension

Autonomy vs Oversight Job Seekers wanted freedom, but managers needed visibility.
Efficiency vs Trust Users wanted speed, but also confidence in results.

Before

After

Understanding the Users

The Jobs module had to serve four very different groups — each with unique goals that often conflicted.

Clients: Job Seekers & Students
The heart of the system

Looking for jobs, training programs, and career support.

Case Managers

Hands-on guides who enable client success

Guiding clients, recommending opportunities & tracking progress.

Admins

System architects

Configuring workflows, managing permissions & ensuring compliance.

Employers

The Opportunity Providers

Posting jobs, reviewing applications, and connecting with candidates.

In our Role-Playing Workshops, stakeholders acted as clients, case managers, and employers.

Uncovered workflow gaps + hidden dependencies.

In State Board Interviews, we had direct talks with government reps.

This exposed compliance needs and operational bottlenecks.

RESEARCH: Role-Playing Workshops & State Board Interviews

Our research revealed one core tension:

👉 “If job seekers get too much freedom, case managers lose oversight. If case managers have too much control, job seekers lose independence.”

This tension became the north star for design decisions- not just smoother workflows, but a balance of autonomy, oversight, and employer needs.

DEFINING PROBLEM STATEMENT

How might we balance autonomy for job seekers with oversight from case managers — while still ensuring employers get the qualified applications they need?

Putting Research to Work

We created a Golden Thread to map the end-to-end journey of clients, case managers, admin and employers—from onboarding to end of the journey. This helped align workflows, highlight pain points, and define user expectations at every stage.

Here's a short glimpse-

Solutions

To balance autonomy, oversight, and employer needs, we redesigned the Jobs module with four key changes:

Clients log in & explore jobs freely — with guided oversight

Problem: Job seekers couldn’t act independently; case managers controlled everything.

Seamless onboarding → Goal setting by job seekers during login

Freedom unlocked → Clients explore jobs independently

Guidance preserved → Case manager recommendations visible

Seamless onboarding → Goal setting by job seekers during login

Freedom unlocked → Clients explore jobs independently

Guidance preserved → Case manager recommendations visible

Video: The redesigned onboarding and job-exploration flow

Smarter job recommendations (system + case manager)

Problem: Students relied completely on case managers for opportunities.

Solution: The system now suggests jobs based on a client’s profile using AI, alongside personalized case manager recommendations.

Faster workflows for case managers (bulk actions)

Problem: Case managers spent too much time managing jobs one by one.

Solution
Manage at scale → Bulk actions for faster recommendations

Time saved → Multiple tasks done in one step

Streamlined employer experience

Problem: Employers needed qualified candidates, but posting and reviewing was slow.

Problem: Employers needed qualified candidates, but posting and reviewing was slow.

Solution: Employers now post jobs quickly with a clean form and receive candidate recommendations directly from case managers.

THE IMPACT

Less dependency on case managers.

Less dependency on case managers.

18%

fewer support calls

fewer support calls

Greater autonomy for job seekers

Greater autonomy for job seekers

25%

More self-served applications

More self-served applications

Efficiency gains for case managers

Efficiency gains for case managers

22%

Faster task completion

Faster task completion

Key Takeaways: Learning and Growing Through Challenges

Stay adaptable

Design thrives even in shifting priorities.

Design thrives even in shifting priorities.

Constraints shape clarity

Compliance and regulation drove smarter simplicity.

Compliance and regulation drove smarter simplicity.

Design is about balancing tensions

Autonomy vs oversight taught me to think beyond features.

Autonomy vs oversight taught me to think beyond features.

Enter Password